First and second waves of coronavirus disease-19: A comparative study in hospitalized patients in Reus, Spain.

Many countries have seen a two-wave pattern in reported cases of coronavirus disease-19 during the 2020 pandemic, with a first wave during spring followed by the current second wave in late summer and autumn. Empirical data show that the characteristics of the effects of the virus do vary between the two periods. Differences in age range and severity of the disease have been reported, although the comparative characteristics of the two waves still remain largely unknown. Those characteristics are compared in this study using data from two equal periods of 3 and a half months. The first period, between 15th March and 30th June, corresponding to the entire first wave, and the second, between 1st July and 15th October, corresponding to part of the second wave, still present at the time of writing this article. Two hundred and four patients were hospitalized during the first period, and 264 during the second period. Patients in the second wave were younger and the duration of hospitalization and case fatality rate were lower than those in the first wave. In the second wave, there were more children, and pregnant and post-partum women. The most frequent signs and symptoms in both waves were fever, dyspnea, pneumonia, and cough, and the most relevant comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and chronic neurological diseases. Patients from the second wave more frequently presented renal and gastrointestinal symptoms, were more often treated with non-invasive mechanical ventilation and corticoids, and less often with invasive mechanical ventilation, conventional oxygen therapy and anticoagulants. Several differences in mortality risk factors were also observed. These results might help to understand the characteristics of the second wave and the behaviour and danger of SARS-CoV-2 in the Mediterranean area and in Western Europe. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Análisis coste-efectividad del tratamiento con presión positiva continua de la vía aérea en el síndrome de apnea-hipopnea durante el sueño (SAHS) moderado-grave / Cost-effectiveness of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment in Moderate-Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Introducción: El síndrome de apnea-hipopnea durante el sueño (SAHS) supone un gran impacto socioeconómico. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el coste-efectividad del tratamiento del SAHS con presión positiva continua de la vía aérea superior (CPAP) y estimar la influencia que tiene el cumplimiento de la CPAP. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de «casos cruzados» de 373 pacientes SAHS tratados con CPAP. Se calcularon variaciones en costes, puntuación en el test de Epworth y calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (cuestionario EQ-5D) entre el año previo al tratamiento y el año después del mismo. Se estimó la ratio de coste-efectividad incremental (RCEI) para el primer año de tratamiento y se realizó una proyección para el segundo año bajo distintos escenarios de efectividad y costes. Resultados: La puntuación de la escala visual analógica del cuestionario EQ-5D aumentó en 5 puntos y el test de Epworth disminuyó en 10 puntos al año del tratamiento con CPAP, con una ganancia media en años de vida ajustados por calidad (AVAC) de 0,05 por paciente y año (p < 0,001): 0,07 en cumplidores y -0,04 en no cumplidores. La RCEI fue de 51.147 €/AVAC durante el primer año de tratamiento con CPAP y de 1.544 €/AVAC el segundo año. Conclusión: El tratamiento con CPAP en pacientes con SAHS moderado-grave mejora la calidad de vida de los pacientes cumplidores y es coste-efectivo a partir del segundo año

Introduction: The socioeconomic impact of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is considerable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of treating OSAHS with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and the impact of CPAP compliance. Methods: This was a retrospective, case-crossover study of 373 patients with OSAHS receiving CPAP. We compared changes in costs, Epworth score and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D questionnaires) between the year before treatment and the year after treatment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the first year of treatment was estimated, and projections were made for the second year, using different effectiveness and cost scenarios. Results: The visual analog scale score for the EQ-5D questionnaire increased by 5 points and the Epworth score fell by 10 points during the year of CPAP treatment. Mean gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) was 0.05 per patient per year (P < .001): 0.07 among compliers and -0.04 among non-compliers. ICER was €51,147/QALY during the first year of CPAP treatment and €1,544/QALY during the second year. Conclusion: CPAP treatment in patients with moderate-severe OSAHS improves the quality of life of compliant patients, and is cost-effective as of the second year

Redistribución de grasa intraabdominal en el tratamiento a largo plazo con presión positiva continua de la vía aérea en los pacientes con síndrome de apnea-hipopnea durante el sueño / Intraabdominal fat redistribution in long-term continuous positive airway pressure treatment in obstructive sleep apnea patients

Fundamento y objetivo: La obesidad es el principal factor de riesgo del síndrome de apneas-hipopneas del sueño (SAHS). El objetivo es evaluar el efecto de la continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP, «presión positiva continua de la vía aérea» a largo plazo en pacientes con SAHS sobre la grasa intraabdominal. Pacientes y métodos: Se incluyeron 50 pacientes SAHS con criterio de CPAP y 35 SAHS no candidatos a CPAP con un seguimiento de 2 años. El visceral adipose tissue (VAT, «tejido adiposo visceral»), el subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT, «tejido adiposo subcutáneo») y la preaortic intraabdominal fat (PIF, «grasa intraabdominal preaórtica») se midieron mediante ecografía. Resultados: En el grupo SAHS no candidatos a CPAP, la media del SAT y del VAT no cambió durante el seguimiento, pero se observó un aumento del PIF (55,19 [23,44] frente a 63,45 [23,94] mm, p = 0,021). En los pacientes SAHS tratados con CPAP, la media del VAT y del PIF no se modificó, pero el SAT disminuyó a los 2 años del tratamiento con CPAP (11,29 [5,69] frente a 10,47 [5,71] mm, p = 0,012). Conclusiones: El tratamiento con CPAP a largo plazo en los pacientes SAHS produce una redistribución de la grasa intraabdominal y se asocia a un perfil antropométrico de menor riesgo cardiovascular (AU)

Background and objective: Obesity is the main risk factor for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The aim was to evaluate the long-term effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on intraabdominal fat distribution in OSA patients. Patients and methods: Fifty OSA patients with and 35 without CPAP treatment criteria were followed-up for 2 years. Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT and SAT) and preaortic intraabdominal fat (PIF) were assessed by sonography. Results: In the non CPAP treated group, SAT and VAT mean values didn’t change, while a significantly PIF growth was observed (55.19 [23.44] vs. 63.45 [23.94] mm, P = .021). In the CPAP treated group, VAT and PIF mean were not changed, while SAT decreased significantly (11.29 [5.69] vs. 10.47 [5.71] mm, P = .012). Conclusions: Long-term CPAP treatment produces intraabdominal fat redistribution and is associated with an anthropometric profile of lower cardiovascular risk in OSA patients (AU)

Cost-effectiveness of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment in Moderate-Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. / Análisis coste-efectividad del tratamiento con presión positiva continua de la vía aérea en el síndrome de apnea-hipopnea durante el sueño (SAHS) moderado-grave.

INTRODUCTION: The socioeconomic impact of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is considerable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of treating OSAHS with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and the impact of CPAP compliance. METHODS: This was a retrospective, case-crossover study of 373 patients with OSAHS receiving CPAP. We compared changes in costs, Epworth score and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D questionnaires) between the year before treatment and the year after treatment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the first year of treatment was estimated, and projections were made for the second year, using different effectiveness and cost scenarios. RESULTS: The visual analog scale score for the EQ-5D questionnaire increased by 5 points and the Epworth score fell by 10 points during the year of CPAP treatment. Mean gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) was 0.05 per patient per year (P<.001): 0.07 among compliers and -0.04 among non-compliers. ICER was €51,147/QALY during the first year of CPAP treatment and €1,544/QALY during the second year. CONCLUSION: CPAP treatment in patients with moderate-severe OSAHS improves the quality of life of compliant patients, and is cost-effective as of the second year.

[Intraabdominal fat redistribution in long-term continuous positive airway pressure treatment in obstructive sleep apnea patients]. / Redistribución de grasa intraabdominal en el tratamiento a largo plazo con presión positiva continua de la vía aérea en los pacientes con síndrome de apnea-hipopnea durante el sueño.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Obesity is the main risk factor for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The aim was to evaluate the long-term effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on intraabdominal fat distribution in OSA patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty OSA patients with and 35 without CPAP treatment criteria were followed-up for 2 years. Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT and SAT) and preaortic intraabdominal fat (PIF) were assessed by sonography. RESULTS: In the non CPAP treated group, SAT and VAT mean values didn't change, while a significantly PIF growth was observed (55.19 [23.44] vs. 63.45 [23.94] mm, P=.021). In the CPAP treated group, VAT and PIF mean were not changed, while SAT decreased significantly (11.29 [5.69] vs. 10.47 [5.71] mm, P=.012). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term CPAP treatment produces intraabdominal fat redistribution and is associated with an anthropometric profile of lower cardiovascular risk in OSA patients.

Enfermedad pulmonar intersticial inducida por hidroxicloroquina / Interstitial lung disease induced by hydroxychloroquine

No disponible

Circulating FABP4 and FABP5 levels are differently linked to OSA severity and treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate circulating adipocyte and epidermal fatty acid-binding protein (FABP4 and FABP5) concentrations in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), as well as the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment. METHODS: Our cross-sectional study included 125 patients. After polysomnography, 58 participants met the criteria for CPAP treatment and were included in a closed cohort study of 8 weeks of CPAP treatment. General anthropometric and biochemical data and circulating FABP4 and FABP5 levels were determined in all patients at baseline and after CPAP treatment in those receiving this therapy. RESULTS: Circulating FABP4 but not FABP5 levels were higher in patients with OSA (P = 0.003). FABP4 but not FABP5 values were associated with parameters of OSA severity independently of age, gender, adiposity and insulin resistance (P < 0.05). FABP4 but not FABP5 concentrations were determinants of OSA presence (OR: 1.11, P = 0.010) and severity (OR: 1.06, P = 0.020). After CPAP treatment, FABP4 levels decreased in the more severe patients (P = 0.019), while FABP5 levels increased in all patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FABP4 is directly associated with obstructive sleep apnea severity and did not change with continuous positive airway pressure treatment, while FABP5 was not associated with obstructive sleep apnea severity and increased with continuous positive airway pressure treatment. FABP4 and FABP5 have different associations with obstructive sleep apnea. FABP4 but not FABP5 could be considered a marker of metabolic alterations in obstructive sleep apnea patients.